WebFeb 20, 2024 · Emphasising the set precedent in ABL Case, the Hon'ble Court further noted that this exposition has been followed by this Court, and has been adopted by three-judge … WebThe appellant Gujarat State Petronet Ltd. (Original Petitioner) has challenged the Order dated 06.08.2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in W.P. No. …
M/S. Siemens Ltd. ... Appellant vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors ...
WebSIEMENS LTD. Respondent: UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS : Court: Bombay High Court State: Maharashtra : Date: Aug 3, 2024 : Order No. STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 1312 OF … Webbefore this Court against the common order dated 10.10.2024 were converted into Criminal Appeal Nos. 1657, 1658, 1659 and 1660 of 2024. By a detailed judgment and order dated … reacted instinctively
Siemens Ltd. Business Responsibility Report
WebApr 9, 2024 · Universal Cables Ltd Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) Conclusion: CIDCO were the best judge to consider compliance with technical and financial conditions. MSETCL was consulted by CIDCO, both on account of the fact that the project had been undertaken by CIDCO on behalf of MSETCL as well as the execution of the same … WebMar 20, 2024 · On 15th September, 2024, in the case of State of Maharashtra & Ors. v. Reliance Industries Ltd. & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 1699 of 2024], wherein the owner of the land was the State whereas the owner of the building was a respondent, it was held that “since, building cannot stand without the land, the building also becomes part of the land. reacted iron 29 mg